Lunes, Enero 24, 2011
St. Peter Julian Eymard on the Mass


"Hear Mass daily; it will prosper the whole day. All your duties will be performed the better for it, and your soul will be stronger to bear its daily cross. The Mass is the most holy act of religion; you can do nothing that can give greater glory to God or be more profitable for your soul than to hear Mass both frequently and devoutly. It is the favorite devotion of the saints"

(St. Peter Julian Eymard)
Read more >>
Linggo, Enero 23, 2011
The Most Rev. Manuel Ureña Pastor, Archbishop of Saragossa, Spain Says Tridentine Latin Mass

This is the first time that a diocesan Bishop from Spain has said the Traditional Latin Mass publicly since the promulgation of Summorum Pontificum. The Mass was attended by 1,200 faihtful, including various government representatives. 



Via Una Voce Málaga.
Read more >>
Biyernes, Enero 21, 2011
Ecumenism is not the Mission of the Church

"Ecumenism is not the Church's mission. The Church is not ecumenical, she is missionary. The goal of the missionary Church is to convert. The goal of the ecumenical Church is to find what is true in errors and to remain at this level. It is to deny the truth of the Church" (Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Apr 14, 1978)
Read more >>
Miyerkules, Enero 12, 2011
Who Can Baptize?

Who Can Baptize?
The Church teaches very unequivocally that for the valid conferring of the sacraments, the minister must have the intention of doing at least what the Church does. This is laid down with great emphasis by the Council of Trent (sess. VII). The opinion once defended by such theologians as Catharinus and Salmeron that there need only be the intention to perform deliberately the external rite proper to each sacrament, and that, as long as this was true, the interior dissent of the minister from the mind of the Church would not invalidate the sacrament, no longer finds adherents. The common doctrine now is that a real internal intention to act as a minister of Christ, or to do what Christ instituted the sacraments to effect, in other words, to truly baptize, absolve, etc., is required. This intention need not necessarily be of the sort called actual. That would often be practically impossible. It is enough that it be virtual. Neither habitual nor interpretative intention in the minister will suffice for the validity of the sacrament. The truth is that here and now, when the sacrament is being conferred, neither of these intentions exists, and they can therefore exercise no determining influence upon what is done. To administer the sacraments with a conditional intention, which makes their effect contingent upon a future event, is to confer them invalidly. This holds good for all the sacraments except matrimony, which, being a contract, is susceptible of such a limitation.
Source: Catholic Encyclopedia
For the aforementioned reason, non-Catholic baptisms may not be valid.  The individual should receive a conditional Baptism.  For more information, see our post on the Sacrament of Baptism.
Read more >>
Bishop Fellay on the Errors of Assisi III

From the sermon of His Grace Bishop Fellay on the Feast of the Epiphany 2011
In theory they know, in theory they believe. But in reality, do they believe? Do they really believe that Our Lord is God? Do they really believe that peace among men, among nations, is in His hand? Do they really believe in all the immediate, direct consequences of His divinity? …Are they all going, like the Magi, the Three Kings, to adore the true God and to look to Him for that peace and to ask Him for it? Are they going to the King of Peace: Rex Pacificus?

Oh, how history repeats itself, alas!

Yes, we are deeply indignant, we vehemently protest against this repetition of the days at Assisi. Everything that we have said, everything that Archbishop Lefebvre had said at the time [of the first World Day of Prayer for Peace in Assisi in 1986], we repeat in our own name. It is evident, my dear brothers, that such a thing demands reparation. What a mystery!

Yes, to adore: what does that mean? To adore means first of all: to recognize, to recognize the divinity. Adoration is given to God alone. And recognizing His divinity immediately implies submission; a declaration of submission to the sovereignty of God. It is to recognize that God has every right over us, that we are really entirely dependent, absolutely dependent upon God for our existence, our life, our ability to act, think, desire, and will. Every good, every good thing that happens to us, comes from the goodness of God. And this is true—not only for believers, not only for Christians—this is true for every creature, absolutely every creature.

God, the Creator of all things, visible and invisible, is also the One who governs this world, the One who sustains all things by the power of His Word, the One in whom everything has its stability! Lord of life and death, of individuals and nations! Almighty, eternal God, to whom all honor and glory is due! Yes, to adore is to put oneself in this posture of humility which acknowledges God’s rights.

Let us go, then, let us go to Our Lord; even though He hides His Divinity, even though He is a tiny Child in the arms of His Mother, He is truly God! He is true God, sent by the mercy of the good God to save us. For He was made man, and in becoming a man he became the Savior, and His name, given by God Himself, is Jesus: the Savior! The only name that has been given under heaven by which we can be saved. The only Savior! The only Holy One, “Tu solus Sanctus” [as we say in the Gloria], who comes to bring us something unheard of: the invitation to God’s eternal happiness.

How can people hope to be able to receive His blessings when they insult Him, when they ignore Him, when they diminish Him? It is madness! How can anyone hope for peace among men when he makes a mockery of God?

And here modern thinking makes truly bizarre sorts of projections: it pretends that all religions, ultimately, adore one and the same true God. That is absolutely false; it is even in Revelation; we find it already in the psalms, in Psalm 96:5, “All the gods of the Gentiles are devils!” They are devils. And Assisi will be full of devils! This is Revelation, this is the Faith of the Church; this is the teaching of the Church!

Now where is continuity? Now where is rupture? What a mystery!

Yes, my dear brothers, if we want to be saved, there is only one way, and that is the way of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Read more >>
Lunes, Enero 10, 2011
On the Transcendence of the Resurrection: Why Do We Forget the Mystery of Our Lord's Rising From the Dead

Take a minute and re-read that title again.  One word at a time.

We so often hear and reminded that our Lord Jesus Christ rose from the Dead.  As the Creed professes most solemnly, "Credo in unum Deum...Crucifíxus étiam pro nobisÑ sub Póntio Pílato passus et sepúltus est.  Et resurréxit tértia die, secúndum Scriptúrus..." [I believe in one God...Who suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried.  On the third day He rose again in accordance with the Scriptures...]

You profess our Lord's death and resurrection in all of your actions.  All of our prayers are grounded in the central point of our Faith - that our Lord Jesus Christ, being truly dead and buried, by His own divine authority raised Himself from the dead.  Our Lord was truly dead.  Do we realize this?  Do you internalize this?

Let's take a minute and read from Fulton J. Sheen's "The Life of Christ" to better understand the transcendence of this historical event of unparalleled importance. 
In the history of the world, only one tomb has ever had a rock rolled before it, and a soldier guard set to watch it to prevent the dead man within from rising: that was the tomb of Christ on the evening of the Friday called Good.  What spectacle could be more ridiculous than armed soldiers keeping their eyes on a corpse?  But sentinels were set, lest the Dead walk, the Silent speak, and the Pierced Heart quieken to the throb of life.  They said He was dead; they knew He was dead; they would say He would not rise again; and yet they watched!  They openly called Him a deceiver  But, would He still deceive?  Would He Who "deceived" them into believing they won the battle, Himself win the war for life and truth and love?  They remembered that He called His Body the Temple and that in three days after they destroyed It, He would rebuild It; they recalled too, that He compared Himself to Jonah and said that was Jonah was in the belly of the whale for three days, so would He be in the belly of the earth for three days and then would rise again.
We continue to fail to marvel at the Resurrection.  It was our Lord's disciples, who upon hearing the news, ran to the tomb to see for themselves that the Master was risen.  The King of the world had conquered even death itself.  The world which was shaken to its core on Good Friday, upon which its Creator gave up His Life.

We must approach the Resurrection every time with the joy of the disciples and the fervent desire to see our Lord that St. Mary Magdalene had.  As she exclaimed, "They have taken the Lord and I know not where they have laid Him."  How do you read those words?  Do they incite into your heart the deep burning desire like Magdalene to see the Lord?  How would you have reacted to below the Lord and Savior of the world stand before you in glory who only three days before you saw descend lifeless from the Cross into the arms of His weeping Mother?

We forget the glory of the Resurrection.  This year we should already look ahead to Lent.  We have just celebrated the Nativity of the Savior.  We continue to recall now the Octave of His Epiphany and will soon begin to journey with Him to the Cross through Lent.  Make this Lent a bitter one of penance so that you may best rejoice in the Master's Resurrection.  He who has not done penance is not fit to celebrate in the Feast of Easter.



May the sounds and sentiments of the Gloria on Easter Morning resonate in your heart each time you hear someone say that the Lord is risen.  Indeed He is truly risen, alleluia.  Never forget the Cross that He bore for you.  Never forget the glory of our Lord, who is the firstborn from the Dead.  The Lord is risen, alleluia.  Let your hearts rejoice and be glad.
Read more >>
Linggo, Enero 9, 2011
Carmelite Fathers of Munster, IN



Image: Father Casimir A. Borcz, OCD


What do you now about this community?  How Traditional are they?  I have heard of their community but am looking to find others with first-hand experience to describe them.
Read more >>
Sabado, Enero 8, 2011
To Serve Christ is to Reign: Archconfraternity of St. Stephen


Read more >>
FSSP Church consecration in Phoenix!



You can find the prayers and rubrics for the Consecration of a Church according to the 1962 Roman Rite on my post dedicated to The Ceremonies of the Consecration of a Church in the Traditional Manner (1962): Part I.

Also visit my post on the Consecration of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter's Seminary Chapel in the Traditional Rite.
Read more >>
Biyernes, Enero 7, 2011
Pope Benedict XVI Wears Beautiful Fiddleback for Mass on Feast of the Epiphany

If you recall, in 2009 Pope Benedict XVI celebrated the Mass on the Epiphany using a beautiful fiddleback.  This year on the Feast of the Epiphany, the Holy Father has again chosen a set of beautiful vestments.  You can see some of them here:




Read more >>


Copyright Notice: Unless otherwise stated, all items are copyrighted under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. If you quote from this blog, cite a link to the post on this blog in your article.

Disclosure of Material Connection: Some of the links on this blog are “affiliate links.” This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, I will receive an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate, for instance, I earn a small commission from qualifying purchases made by those who click on the Amazon affiliate links included on this website. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”