Subscribe to Future Posts on A Catholic Life

Enter email address:



Wednesday, July 12, 2006
The Primacy of Peter: The 1st Pope
edit_button


 Writing on this topic, Fr. John Laux writes in "Catholic Apologetics Book IV":
The protest contention [that the powers bestowed on St. Peter by Christ in Matthew 16 were personal and not permanent] is manifestly wrong; for it is clear from the words with which Our Lord conferred the Primacy on Peter that it was not a personal privilege, such as the power of working miracles or the gift of tongues, but a permanent institution, necessary for the very existence of the Church. 
The Church which Christ founded is to endure till the end of time, and Peter, according to the promise of Christ, is to be the rock foundation of that Church, giving it unity and strength, and securing it against the gates of hell. But the foundation must last as long as the ediface lasts which is built upon it. Hence the power and authority that made Peter the Rock of the Church must remain intact for all time; his Primacy must be perpetuated in the only possible way, that is, by transmission through a continuous line of successors.
Fr. Laux continues:
The Bishops of Rome have always claimed to be the successors of St. Peter, the heirs of his Primacy. No other See in Christendom ever made such a claim. St. Peter ruled the Church of Antioch before he went to Rome, yet Antioch never disputed the right of Rome to the unique dignity of Apostolic Primacy. Ephesus and Smyrna and the other Churches of Asia Minor over which St. John, the Beloved Disciple, presided long after Peter's death never contested the claim of Rome.
This is further shown through a study of history. St. Clement of Rome, the third Successor of St. Peter, governed the Church and exercised the Primacy of the Papal Office for the first recorded time in 96 AD when he dispatched a powerful letter to the Corinthians. This fact of his intervention and jurisdiction is remarkable since the Apostle St. John was himself still alive and presiding over the Church in Ephesus. 
Jesus summoned his Twelve disciples and gave them authority over unclean spirits to drive them out and to cure every disease and every illness. The names of the Twelve Apostles are these: first, Simon called Peter, and his brother Andrew; James, the son of Zebedee, and his brother John; Philip and Bartholomew, Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James, the son of Alphaeus, and Thaddeus; Simon the Cananean, and Judas Iscariot who betrayed Jesus. Jesus sent out these Twelve after instructing them thus,“Do not go into pagan territory or enter a Samaritan town. Go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. As you go, make this proclamation: ‘The Kingdom of heaven is at hand.’”   Matthew 10:1-7
We notice St. Peter is always listed first in every list of the apostles in the Gospels - Judas Iscariot is always listed last. This is one point showing the Primacy of Peter - he is higher than all of the other disciples. Peter's name is mentioned 155 times. All of the other eleven disciples combined are listed only 130 times.

Furthermore, we see in John 21:15-19, the discourse between Peter and Jesus. In this discourse, Jesus says, "Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these [the other disciples]?" Peter says "yes". In that conversation, Peter professes his faith in Christ three times to make up for the three times he denied our Lord during His Passion. Unlike Judas, who lost his soul because he refused to ask God's mercy for his actions, Peter is forgiven because he seeks forgiveness.

In the Acts of the Apostles, Peter is the spokesmen and always speaks for the group. People would lay in the streets just wanting Peter's shadow to fall on them (Acts 5:15). We see that St. Peter was given a higher authority than the other disciples. St. Peter was the first pope - the one that Christ founded His Church upon (Matthew 16:18-20).

6 comments:

del_button July 12, 2006 at 1:56 PM
The Epiphany Artist said...

"Leave me for I am a sinful man." Humility is the answer to following God. Through humility we are raised up and can hope to be perfect in Christ. This statement hit me right in my heart- Thank you!

del_button July 12, 2006 at 2:26 PM
Thane said...

Not to mention that Peter was given the keys to heaven because, when Jesus asked, Peter responded that Jesus was Lord.

del_button July 12, 2006 at 10:11 PM
Anonymous said...

http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/anti5.htm

The above website says that the pope is evil and why... The Papal throne had an inverted cross on it.
The below websites also mention some reasons why the pope is the antichrist. I was just wondering if you might have an answer to why the pope used the inverted cross on his papal throne?

http://www.trosch.org/3bb/bsh/bernardin_j-card.html

http://www.cuttingedge.org/News/n2029.cfm

del_button July 12, 2006 at 10:19 PM
Moneybags said...

The Pope IS NOT the antichrist. This is what saddens me so, so much. Look to Pope John Paul ll! He was a man of love - not of the devil!

An upside down Cross is the symbol of St. Peter. St. Peter was the first Pope and was crucified. He said that he did not want to be crucified in the same manner as Our Lord because he said he was too unworthy. So St. Peter was crucified upside-down.

The Pope is the Successor of St. Peter. An upside down Cross is a symbol of the person that the Pope is succeeding.

Please don't believe in a lie like that! Please, friend, I beg you for the sake of salvation!

del_button July 13, 2006 at 6:01 AM
Danny Garland Jr. said...

As far as I can tell the pictures on the anti-catholic site are made up.I have never seen an inverted cross on a papal chair. Plus when you go to the supposed link where the website owner found the picture, the picture is not there.

I found this picture of a Papal chair. Curiously there is no inverted cross:

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://faculty.cua.edu/pennington/ChurchHistory220/Architecture/Rome/SMariaTrastevereThroneSm.jpg&imgrefurl=http://faculty.cua.edu/pennington/ChurchHistory220/LectureEight/Lect7.html&h=432&w=350&sz=33&hl=en&start=5&tbnid=igJg60Ul7LZAeM:&tbnh=123&tbnw=99&prev=/images%3Fq%3DPapal%2Bthrone%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D

The website also says that Peter himself was the anti-christ. Sounds like some gnostic heresy to me. Next thing you know Anonymous will be saying that Judas was just doing what Jesus wanted him to do.

I bet Anonymous is a fan of Jack Chick.

del_button June 17, 2010 at 5:53 PM
Anonymous said...

The images of the Pope on a stone throne with an inverted cross are real. CNN broadcast this on Mar. 24th 2000. You can see images here.
http://www.ewtn.com/holyland2000/multimedia.htm

This is not a Satanic symbol in the Catholic church. It is called the cross of St. Peter. When St. Peter was crucified, he requested it be done upside down in order to not be compared to Christ.

In Catholicism, the inverted cross is a symbol of piety - a reminder that we should not compare ourselves to Jesus.

It amuses me that I, an atheist, always seem to know more about religions and its symbolism that the faithful.

Copyright / Disclaimer

Copyright Notice: Unless otherwise stated, all items are copyrighted under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. If you quote from this blog, cite a link to the post on this blog in your article.

Disclosure of Material Connection: Some of the links on this blog are “affiliate links.” This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, I will receive an affiliate commission. Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and/or believe will add value to my readers. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”